Most Trusted News Agency

[IamKeenan]

CNN

FOX NEWS

PRAVDA

BBC

F.F.F.F.( Female Fact Finders from L.L. Forum)


P.P. of P. (Putin's Press of Propaganda)


PNN (Pigmy Nation News) Sending Smoke Signals From Deep in the Amazon Rain Forest

[Sveta's Hero]

PNN, because they have the best sports and weather.:becky::p

[1amongmany]

considering they are all bias I watch most of them, remove their opinions and only then I see the real news....

but you asked for the MOST trusted therefore I would say CNN

[huney]

FFFF. Best fantasy :p

[IamKeenan]

PNN, because they have the best sports and weather.:becky::p
Yeah coz the weather is easy, since it is the RAIN FOREST!!!:lol::lol::lol::lol:

[brown-raider]

CNN the Communist news network....:lol:

[brown-raider]

It has to be Pravda because Bella said so!!!:lol:

[brown-raider]

Pravda I wouldn't read that rag with Raymond's eyeballs!...:eek: or Hoopy's for that matter...

[IamKeenan]

It has to be Pravda because Bella said so!!!:lol:


Well I figured as a joke I would add them coz to be honest I would rather get my news from the Pygmies of the Amazon then Pravada:lol:

[brown-raider]

Keenan. I wonder if Putin is moonlighting translateing the Fox news network in Russia? verbatem of course..:lol:

[dzerassa]

but you asked for the MOST trusted therefore I would say CNN

ну ну :washing::

[IamKeenan]

Keenan. I wonder if Putin is moonlighting translateing the Fox news network in Russia? verbatem of course..:lol:

Frank I bet he is Polishing up some lie to spread about that country. And still try to win the hearts of the Russian People. Most are on to his game now. :yo:

[brown-raider]

Frank I bet he is Polishing up some lie to spread about that country. And still try to win the hearts of the Russian People. Most are on to his game now. :yo:not bella she's a hardliner:becky:

[fbibob]

A study was done several years ago to measure bias in the major news outlets.

All of the broadcast outlets had a liberal or conservative bias, some worse than others.

The only outlet to measure neutral in its coverage was the Drudge Report. (drudgereport.com)

[beezneesman]

Why did you leave Al-Jazeera off the list?

[IamKeenan]

Why did you leave Al-Jazeera off the list?

They are not worth talking about;)

[beezneesman]

They are not worth talking about;)

They are a far more credible news source than FOX News FFS.

Just because you don't like some of the things they report it doesn't mean they are a bad source. Al-Jazeera is funded by the Emir of Qatar (many of its senior founding personnel were trained by and worked for the BBC).

In case you hadn't noticed the Emir of Qatar is such an implacable enemy of the USA that his country is currently playing host to US Central Command (CENTCOM). :rolleyes:

[colomoda]

I voted BBC because it is the only one I know :p

[Voobrazheniye]

They are a far more credible news source than FOX News FFS.


You forgot to add, "in my opinion."

[alpine-frolic]

I trust no one and nobody....

[IamKeenan]

I trust no one and nobody....

Then vote for the
Pygmies, Pygmy!!!!!!:lol:

[brown-raider]

Why did you leave Al-Jazeera off the list?
he didn't that is known as CNN in America..:lol:

[saprosky]

I voted BBC because is the most trustworthy of the list but not the most.

In our 11-M information were very confused about who was the author of the attack.

Government ordered to say was ETA (The separatist basque group) and our National TV and Radio station only could say that, even knowing was not ETA the author.

Only a few spanish and internationals news agencies and TV stations said the truth. After that I only can trust on them.

[IamKeenan]

I voted BBC because is the most trustworthy of the list but not the most.

In our 11-M information were very confused about who was the author of the attack.

Government ordered to say was ETA (The separatist basque group) and our National TV and Radio station only could say that, even knowing was not ETA the author.

Only a few spanish and internationals news agencies and TV stations said the truth. After that I only can trust on them.


You know I like BBC really. It is a change from the same news over and over. And since it is in Europe I can hear more troubles that Putin is into:lol:

[Gabbibo]

i voted BBC too

after SOssetian conflict all TV chanels have the same sourse but gaved us the information where was involved their interes

CNN for USA
Euronews for Brussels

BBC was and is for people, i didnt feel their interesses, no more comments, just facts


i agree that Al jazeera is a good news sourse too

[Hoopy]

I wanted to vote for the daily Bella :lol:

[IamKeenan]

I wanted to vote for the daily Bella :lol:


But Doesn't she support The Russanna Rogue Army?:lol:

[beezneesman]

You forgot to add, "in my opinion."

I think we can take it as read that as this is the interweb that opinions are like arseholes - everyone has one.

Sorry if I needed to spell that out for the hard of learning:rolleyes:

[Andylad]

Why did you leave Al-Jazeera off the list?

i had never seen this news channel until about 3 days ago & i have never been big into politics, those lying cheating tosser politicians just wind me up, but my mate turned my tv over to watch Al-jazeera, was really impressed by it, no garbage about what Victoria Beckham is wearing or who the the latest celebrity is sleeping with, i find myself watching it all the time now!

[Lucker]

Handyman,
And that's reflected in the number of people they have taken from British TV .

[brown-raider]

i had never seen this news channel until about 3 days ago & i have never been big into politics, those lying cheating tosser politicians just wind me up, but my mate turned my tv over to watch Al-jazeera, was really impressed by it, no garbage about what Victoria Beckham is wearing or who the the latest celebrity is sleeping with, i find myself watching it all the time now!do they show the latest in Burka wear...:lol:

[beezneesman]

do they show the latest in Burka wear...:lol:

you could always check it out
http://english.aljazeera.net/

[vitashenka]

you forgot to add "saakashvilly propoganda news"... Ops... sorry, i see it... cnn, bbc....
As well godd idear to mention "Bush's propoganda news" also

[IamKeenan]

:Elffy_36:you forgot to add "saakashvilly propoganda news"... Ops... sorry, i see it... cnn, bbc....
As well godd idear to mention "Bush's propoganda news" also

Jealous my dear????????:lol: Dont worry I am sure you will have news agency so you can use all the bullshit you hear:lol:

[Lucker]

Wasn't that remark so typical of the garbage we have had to put up with for the last few weeks .
Never a fact . Just silly comments .
Never any reasoning or sourced back up .
It really is totally unproductive for a public Forum and I for one am heartily sick of it .

[Neilikka]

Just on the contrary! I am sure that the Forum is for comments. We have our Press for getting facts. What new can you or I say? We can only inform each other about those facts we have read, or seen, or heard of. Is it interesting for the Forum? I don't think so. Comments and opinios are interesting, nothing else.
Ramon, your and only your opinion and comments are interesting(for me, at least). You know it. So stop being sick and tired of the Forum. Go on commenting. Pease!

[IamKeenan]

Wasn't that remark so typical of the garbage we have had to put up with for the last few weeks .
Never a fact . Just silly comments .
Never any reasoning or sourced back up .
It really is totally unproductive for a public Forum and I for one am heartily sick of it .

Actually Ramon I would not expect anything different from her. I am willing to bet a seat on Putins Mafia Roundtable that I could take her to each and every world event that she scoffs at and let her see with her own beady little eyes and she would never change her mind. It is just part of the arrogance she posesses with the way that has always been shown to her.

Never having an objective mind to try and figure out right from wrong. Must be hard:confused:

[alpine-frolic]

Arrogance? i have recently read this word, but where?

[brown-raider]

you could always check it out
http://english.aljazeera.net/nothing on Burka wear today... but of course there was the daily dose of death to America death to Israel trash... funny though didn't see anything on the armed guards in place behind the 25 feet of concrete who will be there in case somebody like Jesus come through the Golden Gate, as prophesised, that's of courses after he walks through desecrated land on the other side of the wall which is now a cemetary... :becky:

[IamKeenan]

nothing on Burka wear today... but of course there was the daily dose of death to America death to Israel trash... funny though didn't see anything on the armed guards in place behind the 25 feet of concrete who will be there in case somebody like Jesus come through the Golden Gate, as prophesised, that's of courses after he walks through desecrated land on the other side of the wall which is now a cemetary... :becky:

You are so right Frank coz Jesus will have the last laugh in Mecca:lol:

[brown-raider]

Arrogance? i have recently read this word, but where?obama is an arrogant bastard, maybe that's where...:lol:

[beezneesman]

nothing on Burka wear today... but of course there was the daily dose of death to America death to Israel trash... funny though didn't see anything on the armed guards in place behind the 25 feet of concrete who will be there in case somebody like Jesus come through the Golden Gate, as prophesised, that's of courses after he walks through desecrated land on the other side of the wall which is now a cemetary... :becky:

Really?
The lead story when I looked seemed to be 'Bush upbeat about bail out plan' didn't seem to be death to Amerika to me

[brown-raider]

Really?
The lead story when I looked seemed to be 'Bush upbeat about bail out plan' didn't seem to be death to Amerika to mebelzebub, I actualy read the rest of the articles, little disappointed though, had to read without picture!!:lol:
there were some interesting articles... but there is the death to America .... the al asqa mosque article..

[Lucker]

[QUOTE=Neilikka;12379]Just on the contrary! I am sure that the Forum is for comments. We have our Press for getting facts. What new can you or I say?

My criticism did not have you in mind , Bella , my little rose bud !! .Naturally you pay a heavy price as the messenger of Pravda's invariable diet of tripe and onions but I never forget that you are the messenger and not necessarily the advocate .
But I was frankly dismayed and sad at the abysmal standard of comment and discussion in the several recent topics as they related to the spat in S.O. , Abkhazia and Georgia .
I presented a running diet of occurrences , dates and names which were the backbone of my overall view . Later , thanks to Honey , we obtained a copy of the Georgian Government's Time Graph of events and I even spoke to the Georgian Embassy here in London about matters and this specific document .
The charges against the Russian Government were huge and basically the scenario that I obtained was from a variety of sites which backed up the official Georgian view and was totally contradictory to the Russian claims .
Sites which I look at include Kavkazcenter which is brilliant , and , like Al Jazeera , operates to very high standards .Also Debka , Eurasian Daily Monitor , North Caucasus Weekly and even Novayagazeta .
Another invaluable source are the independent Human Rights organisations including Red Cross .
It was abundantly clear that Russians who hated my opinions had absolutely no sources whatsoever , other than internal State organised TV and Press information .
Nobody but a Russian with misplaced patriotism would seriously suggest that these sources are really worth listening to and reading in the first place . They are literally , diabolical and even if the likes of Fox , CNN and BBC were 50% as biased as Russians would like to believe , they are a hundred times more reliable and truthful than any Russian internal news .
So we had a scenario where there was no effective and meaningful discussions and it was interesting because my impression was that Russian young women had suffered from selective word blindness which is a standard symptom of hysteria .
At the end of these Topics I very nearly decided to pull out almost completely because whether my opinions were sound or absolute rubbish , I was not engaging with people who were helping discussion and fact finding in any real way . Frankly ,I would have been better off having a two way chat with myself in the mirror .
Now I propose to base all my future participation with Russians on political Topics with that past history in mind .
That is a pity for me , for others and also in terms of a healthy Public Forum . But that's how I see it .

[beezneesman]

belzebub, I actualy read the rest of the articles, little disappointed though, had to read without picture!!:lol:
there were some interesting articles... but there is the death to America .... the al asqa mosque article..

I wouldn't mind betting that even American media outlets occasionally publish articles about people yelling Death to America etc etc

[IamKeenan]

I wouldn't mind betting that even American media outlets occasionally publish articles about people yelling Death to America etc etc

No mostly we see people like you standing on a soap box reading from a cue card shouting nonsence while drinking and eating your Tea-n-Crumpets:lol:

Nice work Sneezeman!!!:lol:

[beezneesman]

No mostly we see people like you standing on a soap box reading from a cue card shouting nonsence while drinking and eating your Tea-n-Crumpets:lol:

Nice work Sneezeman!!!:lol:

Or more likely neocon chickenhawks standing on their soapboxes telling the world how they all must be more like America
LOL

'Project for the New American Century' anyone?

[brown-raider]

Or more likely neocon chickenhawks standing on their soapboxes telling the world how they all must be more like America
LOL

'Project for the New American Century' anyone?funny don't remem:yo:ber Churchill calling all the sand people for help!

[beezneesman]

funny don't remem:yo:ber Churchill calling all the sand people for help!

Well seeing as Churchill was actually 'half'-American it's probably not surprising that he sought an alliance with his 'mother' country!

BTW what does Churchill have to do with a thread about news agencies or is this another case of Americans deciding that when they're on the back foot in a debate then it's best to play the 'we saved ur asses card'?

That'd be right wouldn't it Cletus? But in case you think we owe you something for providing us with much of the kit we used to help liberate Europe (rather than save ourselves) then think again because we've paid it back. What you haven't paid back to us yet is the royalties on all the free technology transfer you got from us between 1940 and 1945.

[ANGELOLGA]

PARAVADADADA
:lol::lol::lol:

[alpine-frolic]

Well seeing as Churchill was actually 'half'-American it's probably not surprising that he sought an alliance with his 'mother' country!

BTW what does Churchill have to do with a thread about news agencies or is this another case of Americans deciding that when they're on the back foot in a debate then it's best to play the 'we saved ur asses card'?

That'd be right wouldn't it Cletus? But in case you think we owe you something for providing us with much of the kit we used to help liberate Europe (rather than save ourselves) then think again because we've paid it back. What you haven't paid back to us yet is the royalties on all the free technology transfer you got from us between 1940 and 1945.

Finally time has passed , might we wonder if our grand parents made the good choice, asking help to US?

[slkasop]

This is humorous but trustworthiness of news sources is in keeping with this topic's subject matter:

The Demographics of American Newspapers:
1. The Wall Street Journal is read by the people who run the country.

2. The Washington Post is read by people who think they run the country.

3. The New York Times is read by people who think they should run the country, and who are very good at crossword puzzles.

4. USA Today is read by people who think they ought to run the country, but don't really understand The New York Times. They do, however, like their statistics shown in pie charts.

5. The Los Angeles Times is read by people who wouldn't mind running the country, if they could find the time, and if they didn't have to leave Southern California to do it.

6. The Boston Globe is read by people whose parents used to run the country and did a poor job of it, thank you very much.

7. The New York Daily News is read by people who aren't too sure who's running the country and don't really care as long as they can get a seat on the train.

8. The New York Post is read by people who don't care who is running the country as long as they do something really scandalous, preferably while intoxicated, and who like their news as pictures and/or cartoons
.
9. The Miami Herald is read by people who are running another country, but need the baseball scores


10. The San Francisco Chronicle is read by people who aren't sure if there is a country or that anyone is running it; but if so, they oppose all that they stand for. There are occasional exceptions if the leaders are handicapped minority feminist atheist dwarfs who also happen to be illegal aliens from any other country or galaxy, provided of course, that they are not Republicans.

11. The National Enquirer is read by people trapped in line at the grocery store.

12. The Seattle Times is read by people who have recently caught a fish and need something in which to wrap it..