PDA

View Full Version : Russia boycotts UN meeting on Iran as American empire nears its collapse


Neilikka
09-24-2008, 11:43 AM
Russia disrupted the key meeting of the foreign ministers of six mediators for Iran. The meeting was supposed to be held to discuss the passing of the fourth resolution of the UN Security Council, a spokesman for the General Assembly said.
A US diplomat said that the ministers representing six countries participating in the talks for the solution of the Iranian nuclear program were supposed to gather in New York. However, Russia considered the meeting inappropriate. Neither Russia, nor China were ready to start the discussion of another decision requiring the introduction of sanctions against Iran.
The US official said that Russia’s decision to boycott the meeting was largely motivated with Condoleezza Rice’s speech, in which the US Secretary of State said that Russia was nearing its own isolation on the international arena.
In the meantime, Iran's president told the U.N. General Assembly on Tuesday that "the American empire" is nearing collapse and should end its military involvement in other countries.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said terrorism is spreading quickly in Afghanistan while "the occupiers" are still in Iraq nearly six years after Saddam Hussein was ousted from power in Iraq.
"American empire in the world is reaching the end of its road, and its next rulers must limit their interference to their own borders," Ahmadinejad said.
He accused the U.S. of starting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to win votes in elections and blamed a "few bullying powers" for trying to undermine Iran's nuclear program.
Ahmadinejad's hardline rhetoric came as no surprise and offered little in the way of compromise at the U.N., where he faces a new round of sanctions if no agreement is reached on limiting Iran's nuclear capabilities.
While he reiterated that the country's nuclear program is purely peaceful, the U.S. and others fear it is aimed at producing enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons.
Iran already is under three sets of sanctions by the U.N. Security Council for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment. Washington and its Western allies are pushing for quick passage of a fourth set of sanctions to underline the international community's resolve, but are likely to face opposition from Russia.
"A few bullying powers have sought to put hurdles in the way of the peaceful nuclear activities of the Iranian nation by exerting political and economic pressures against Iran," he said.
Ahmadinejad also lashed out at Israel on Tuesday, saying "the Zionist regime is on a definite slope to collapse, and there is no way for it to get out of the cesspool created by itself and its supporters."
The Iranian president is feared and reviled in Israel because of his repeated calls to wipe the Jewish state off the map, and his aggressive pursuit of nuclear technology has only fueled Israel's fears.
Ahmadinejad accused "a small but deceitful number of people called Zionists ... (of) dominating an important portion of the financial and monetary centers as well as the political decision-making centers of some European countries and the U.S."
Israeli President Shimon Peres reacted angrily to Ahjmadinejad's criticism. "It is again a repetition of the darkest accusations in the name of Hitler and almost anti-Semitism," Peres later told journalists.
In discussing the U.S. war in Iraq, Ahmadinejad said, "Millions have been killed or displaced, and the occupiers, without a sense of shame, are still seeking to solidify their position in the ... region and to dominate oil resources."
He suggested that the presence of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan has contributed to a sharp rise in terrorism and a huge increase in the production of narcotics.
He predicted that the alliance would not be successful.
"Throughout history every force that has entered Afghanistan has left in defeat," Ahmadinejad said.
His speech came just hours after President George W. Bush made his eighth and final appearance before the U.N. General Assembly, urging the international community to stand firm against the nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea.
"A few nations, regimes like Syria and Iran, continue to sponsor terror," Bush said. "Yet their numbers are growing fewer, and they're growing more isolated from the world. As the 21st century unfolds, some may be tempted to assume that the threat has receded. This would be comforting. It would be wrong."
At one point during Bush's 22-minute speech, Ahmadinejad turned to Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki and gave a thumb's down.
As in past years, the United States only had a low-level note-taker present for the Iranian president's address, said Richard Grenell, spokesman for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. The U.S. and Iran do not have diplomatic relations.
During interviews ahead of his speech Tuesday, Ahmadinejad blamed U.S. military interventions around the world in part for the collapse of global financial markets.
"The U.S. government has made a series of mistakes in the past few decades," Ahmadinejad said an interview with the Los Angeles Times. "The imposition on the U.S. economy of the years of heavy military engagement and involvement around the world ... the war in Iraq, for example. These are heavy costs imposed on the U.S. economy.
"The world economy can no longer tolerate the budgetary deficit and the financial pressures occurring from markets here in the United States, and by the U.S. government," he added.

Pravda.ru

Lucker
09-24-2008, 12:26 PM
This was all assumed and discussed a week ago by the cognoscenti and chattering parts of governments and Intelligence Services . It is just a play that has be to be finished to preserve public positions .
The interesting aspect is the hidden one --- what is happening behind the scenes to really progress matters both with Iran and North Korea . According to the Atomic Inspection Committee the position with Iran is even more dire and North Korea are predictably playing smart arse and possibly running rings round simple Yanky Boys .

brown-raider
09-24-2008, 01:26 PM
the terrible towels are angry.... as they cry on Russias shoulder, nothing new hear, sme old bull.. bella:lol:

RiverRock
09-24-2008, 04:58 PM
Why does Russia ally itself with all the crackpot, outcast dictators?

fbibob
09-24-2008, 05:59 PM
Why does Russia ally itself with all the crackpot, outcast dictators?

Professional courtesy?

RiverRock
09-24-2008, 07:32 PM
"Throughout history every force that has entered Afghanistan has left in defeat," Ahmadinejad said.

Your very funny Ahmadinejad. Like they did it on their own.

(Osama Bin Laden, for example, was part of an enormous Islamic militancy encouraged and trained by the US to help fight the Soviet Union. Of course, these extremists are all too happy to take credit for fighting off the Soviets in Afghanistan, never acknowledging how it could not have been done without their so-called “great satan” friend-turned-enemy!)

I feel sorry for all the poor countries like Afghanistan, Iran, Vietnam, Korea that are just pawns in the game played between the most powerful countries. Russia supporting crazy dictatorial leaders and the U.S. supporting freely elected leaders. While both fighting because of oil.

RiverRock
09-24-2008, 10:08 PM
*you're very funny Ahmadinejad.

Neilikka
09-25-2008, 02:14 AM
You're funny Brandon. On the contrary, the USA is always supporting crazy dictatorial leaders and Russia supports freely elected leaders.:)

IamKeenan
09-25-2008, 03:05 AM
You're funny Brandon. On the contrary, the USA is always supporting crazy dictatorial leaders and Russia supports freely elected leaders.:)

Really Who?? I think you have your facts backwards:lol::yo:

IamKeenan
09-25-2008, 03:10 AM
Why does Russia ally itself with all the crackpot, outcast dictators?


I know the answer to this one, It is because all the crackpot, outcast leaders are Spawned by Russia's Dictators. And then released into their respective countries to wreck havoc on the rest of the world until America and our allies are called on to come and clean up the horrible mess!!!:yo:

brown-raider
09-25-2008, 08:31 AM
You're funny Brandon. On the contrary, the USA is always supporting crazy dictatorial leaders and Russia supports freely elected leaders.:)wow she has it bad!

:eek::eek:

beezneesman
09-25-2008, 09:16 AM
"Throughout history every force that has entered Afghanistan has left in defeat," Ahmadinejad said.

Actually that's not true (of course)Alexander the Great fought through Afghanistan and only turned back when he reached India, the forces of Islam conquered Afghanistan, the Mongols conquered Afghanistan. The British never tried to rule Afghanistan (they wanted a 'buffer' state against Russia). After an initial defeat in Kabul (through their own incompetence rather than Afghan prowess) the British pretty much laid waste to Afghanistan in revenge during the so-called First Afghan War. The Soviet Union pulled out because it was collapsing not because of decisive Afghan military victories (and without American Stinger missiles the mujahideen were basically getting nowhere).

The reason these powers did not stay after defeating the Afghans is that there's really no reason to stay because there's fcuk all there that's worth staying for!!:)